 |
| ©Tchago Tavares - http://www.sxc.hu/profile/tchago |
This morning, I asked myself which strategy would I choose about Quark Xpress if I was Ray Schiavone, CEO of Quark. I know, it may seem a bit strange to have such ideas in the morning ;-)
As many designers, I was a fan of Quark Xpress in the 90's… I've discovered Indesign in the early 2000, I've learnt to hate Quark Xpress from version 5 to version 7, and learnt to love Indesign at the same time…
Then, in the past two years, I've discovered again Quark Xpress 8, appreciated it very much, and at the same time, used it with Quark Xpress Server and Quark Publishing System.
Since Ray Schiavone has been appointed CEO at Quark, a new strategy has been defined : desktop app such as Xpress or CopyDesk are no longer the main development axis. Emphasis has been put on dynamic publishing, through Quark Xpress Server, Quark Publishing System, and more recently, Quark Promote and Quark Web-to-Print System, based on Gluon technology (bought by Quark at spring).
During the same period, Quark Xpress 8 has been improved : more stable, easier to use, embedding multichannel publishing features, cheaper prices, special bundles… But I wonder if Xpress 8 doesn't pay for the mistakes of his elder brothers : DTP software users has turned massively to Indesign, it's a fact. And I'm not sure they're going to switch back, even for a high-quality software such as Xpress 8.
Even if its strategy is based on dynamic publishing, Quark corner stone remains Xpress : templates for Quark Promote or files used in QPS must be in Quark Xpress format… it can prevent user from buying such technologies because they're already using Indesign.
So I was wondering myself if a strategy couldn't be for Quark to “open the code” of Quark Xpress.
In the software industry, DTP is one of the only fields where there's no real alternative to paying software. You find Adobe Indesign, Quark Xpress, Microsoft Publisher, and other less-known technologies, and only one open-source alternative, called
Scribus. But Scribus is not really used by professional…
So if I was Ray, I would choose to release immediately Xpress 8 as a free software, with open-source code. It could be a great way to retrieve a nice brand image, and to get customers switch back to my technology… and at the same time, it will facilitate the deployment of my dynamic publishing solutions based on Xpress…
But I'm not Ray.